P. S. Its account on Threads is still closed for platforms compatible with Activity Pub.
In Portuguese:
https://social.vivaldi.net/@everton137/113209148435479958
#Brazil #digitalsovereignty#Threads #fediverse#Lula#Mastodon#ActivityPub
P. S. Its account on Threads is still closed for platforms compatible with Activity Pub.
In Portuguese:
https://social.vivaldi.net/@everton137/113209148435479958
#Brazil #digitalsovereignty#Threads #fediverse#Lula#Mastodon#ActivityPub
https://millsfield.sfomuseum.org/blog/2024/03/12/activitypub/
Decentralised social media (with emphasis placed alternately on those words), deserves so much more than attempting to be Just Another VC-backed Twitter Clone.
#ActivityPub does not do what people confidently like to assert that it does.
AP:
* Does not allow you to communicate with others using AP.
* Does not, even when fully implemented and correctly implemented (which it is not and I don't actually think is worthwhile given the amount of work involved), allow you to communicate with others using AP.
* Does not give you the ability to use the same _clients_.
I keep seeing these justifications again and again.
https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna/113204451552765782
#ActivityPub _is not a protocol_ in its base form. It is a _family_ of protocols that are not mutually intelligible.
The reason it seems like it is mutually intelligible is because of a great deal of hard work from a lot of skilled volunteers dedicating their time to make things work together and to make it so that systems can talk to each other.
But that's not something you get out of the box.
#ActivityPub does not do what people confidently like to assert that it does.
AP:
* Does not allow you to communicate with others using AP.
* Does not, even when fully implemented and correctly implemented (which it is not and I don't actually think is worthwhile given the amount of work involved), allow you to communicate with others using AP.
* Does not give you the ability to use the same _clients_.
I keep seeing these justifications again and again.
https://hachyderm.io/@hrefna/113204451552765782
Github repo here: https://github.com/dahlia/fedify/releases/tag/1.0.0
#fedify #framework #typescript #activitypub #foss #opensource #oss #ghostcms #ghostblog #fediverse
People were doing it on #Geocities in 1996, and they didn't have #Google or #RSS, either.
Hell, the social internet predates all this bullshit, too, as bix points out in this post.
https://bix.blog/posts/holy-hell-the-social-web-did-not-begin-in-2008
They have my condolences for having drawn the attention of #HackerNews and #Lemmy; they're very silly places, especially HN, which is basically College Republicans who majored in CS at Stanford.
@kathhayhoe
@renewable_energy_club
@globalecoguy
@MichaelEMann
@britishantarcticsurvey
@stshank
Follow their accounts in the app to see their photography right alongside content from your favorite publishers. If you miss them in the tab, you can always search for their accounts on Flipboard.
Download the Flipboard app to check it out:
https://about.flipboard.com/download-flipboard/
#Flipboard#Federation#ActivityPub#ClimateChange#Science#Environment#Fediverse#MastodonMigration
I strongly disagree that #ActivityPub, the Fediverse and the social web are synonymous. I think that's a divisive and inaccurate claim and I hope the Foundation will reconsider that position.
the concept of a nebulous but mostly singular "network" or "protocol" (made up of partially overlapping parts) is core to what i'll call "fedi mindset". the assumption is that you can join the fedi "network" by implementing the fedi "protocol". and that AP is this.
3/?
first, consider #ActivityPub C2S. why is there close to zero usage of this in #fediverse software? simple: it doesn't solve any needs for building a "network" "protocol".
now consider S2S. why are there zero compliant impls in fedi? because AP as specified doesn't address the needs of fedi. what does fedi need? well, i find it telling that the "real" reason AP was adopted was... to implement followers-only posts.
4/?
because the answer that #ActivityPub gives is actually a different one. There is no "AP network", because AP as a protocol is not enough to build a concrete network. it is intended to provide, and exists in context of, the larger #Web.
8/?
i've seen it said that the "open-world assumption" at the foundation of the Web is actually an undesirable thing for a "social networking protocol", and as a consequence, specs built on that open-world assumption are "completely unsuitable" for that "protocol".
but do we need a "social networking protocol"? do we even need "social networks" in the first place?
9/?
fedi grew out of a long line of open protocols, and before AP was adopted, it was at the point where people primarily used "activity streams" as their vocabulary and data model, stuffed into atom feeds. atom feeds don't do private posts unless you make an entirely new access-controlled feed, possibly with a token of some sort. hence, AS2.
5/?
simply put, AP is not enough for a "protocol" to build a "network".
7/?
because the answer that #ActivityPub gives is actually a different one. There is no "AP network", because AP as a protocol is not enough to build a concrete network. it is intended to provide, and exists in context of, the larger #Web.
8/?
- it was built on AS2, which was an evolution of AS1, which was already being used. so it wasn't hard to make the jump.
- it made followers-only posts possible, because while atom feeds *could* do this, it was wildly inconvenient to actually do it that way. posting something private to an inbox is a lot simpler, no juggling access control tokens.
6/?
simply put, AP is not enough for a "protocol" to build a "network".
7/?
https://bix.blog/posts/holy-hell-the-social-web-did-not-begin-in-2008
While they’re harsh words, I hope @swf will receive this earnest feedback with grace and reconsider its positioning accordingly.
I might get flamed for sharing this, but I have to be honest about what I really think, and why I have some problems stomaching how things are happening.
three things that are sending an off-beat kind of vibe:
1) their fedi handle seems broken in a regular browser (see image)
2) so far they just posted things on X and Threads
3) Meta is one of the founding partners
The foundation's focus is educating the public and policy makers about the social web, enhancing and extending the ActivityPub protocol, and building tools and plumbing to make the social web easier to use. “With this program, The Social Web Foundation can catalyze more growth on the Fediverse while improving user experience and safety,” says Prodromou. “Our goal is to unblock users, developers and communities so they can get the most out of their social web experience.”
We are proud to support the work of the foundation. Read more about the it here:
https://socialwebfoundation.org/
#ActivityPub#Federation#Fediverse#OpenSocialWeb#SocialWebFoundation#SpreadMastodon